Greetings, Internet Void,
As you have no doubt noticed (assuming you've worked out ASCII and those other encoding formats), there seems to be two versions of English floating around and a whole lot of debate over which one to use where. It's starting to seem as if bringing English over to America during the British invasion of New England (not that I have a problem with the result, it's just that the initial act was a little rude) was a bad idea. If we'd just started with a fresh new language, we wouldn't have this problem. Instead of letting English evolve into two slightly different languages due to physical and cultural separation and then debating over which one is correct, we'd just have an extra language to translate, which wouldn't be a problem at all since we seem to be handling the ones we've got right now just fine (and even some "fictional" ones).
As it is though, we've got these two almost identical languages causing a lot of pointless
flamewars over at
Wikipedia when really, it does not matter the slightest bit which one we use. Anyone who knows English knows that "metre" and "meter" are
exactly the same thing. Some argue that "meter" should be used for measurement devices and "metre" for the unit because then you can tell them apart by spelling. So they should also be pronounced "
meatur" and "
meatreh" so that you can tell them apart in speech, right? Alternatively, we can all just spell them however we want and tell them apart by context.
Language is such an imprecise communication tool that it's really pointless to argue over these sorts of things anyway.
I could leave it at that pretty elegantly, but I'm not one for being articulate, so here's an example:
"Give me that screwdriver."
"Would you please hand me the screwdriver?"
These two are exactly the same but some people are inevitably going to be offended by the first one. People demand all these little embellishments that makes language in general incredibly inefficient. There's no reason for this thing called "politeness," and there's no reason (outside of "art") for this thing called "connotation."
They are both inextricably linked to language, though, and as a result the part that matters gets clouded up by all these meaningless little details, and a lot of information gets lost in a flurry of emotions.
Emotions.
We could certainly do without some of them.
The above sentiment brought to you by some of the emotions we could do with out.
And the same to that one
Etc.